From: Gary Britt
Its just PC cover. Hell Bush doesn't even want to build the
southern border fence.
Gary
Robert G Lewis wrote:
Secure Fence Act of
2006
http:">http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:4:./temp/%7Ec109fvGODL">http:
//thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:4:./temp/~c109fvGODL::
(a) In General- The Secretary of Homeland
Security shall conduct a study on the feasibility of a state of-the-art
infrastructure security system along the northern international land and
maritime border of the United States and shall include in the
study--
(1) the necessity of implementing such a
system;
(2) the feasibility of
implementing such a
system; and
(3) the economic impact
implementing such a
system will have along the northern border.
(b) Report- Not later than one
year after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall
submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs of the Senate a report that contains the results of the study
conducted under subsection (a).
Not pushing as such, but definitely under
consideration. I don't know that extreme minority would be correct
.
Personally I don't see why they
aren't pushing on
the Northern border as well. We should have reasonable control of the
borders.
"Gary Britt" <glbNOSPAM">mailto:glbNOSPAM{at}gencogDOTcom.com">glbNOSPAM
{at}gencogDOTcom.com>
wrote in message news:454b6527$1{at}w3.nls.ne
t...
Bushies aren't pushing a Canadian border. Maybe some select
politically correct let's build a fence to the north so the Mexicans can't
claim we are racist republicans advocate this, but they are an extreme
minority among republicans.
Gary
Rich Gauszka wrote:
It's the outsiders-are-evil Bushies
that are pushing the
Canadian fence
proposal. I haven't seen any initiatives from local Canadian border
communities ( Detroit included ) to request a 'protective' fence.
"John Beamish" <JLBeamish{at}rogers.com>">mailto:JLBeamish{at}rogers.com"><JLBeamish{at}rogers.com>
wrote in
message
news:
op.tif01cc9m6tn4t{at}dellblack.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com....
Old Testament, psalm 22. Officially "A Mari usqua ad mare" but
the bon mot of the moment acknowledges the Arctic Ocean and now people talk
about "sea to sea to sea".
The Americans know we're here ... they're talking about a wall along the
northern border, too. (I guess all serious problems have been solved.)
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:30:42 -0500, Adam field.near the bridge">
<"<""4thwormcastfromthemolehill"{at}the">
wrote:
Gary Britt wrote:
That's an even in Mexico. Not the USA.
That's like confusing Norway with the UK.
Gary
ROFLMAO.
North America != the USA. I accept that, as a man who never realized Canada
was to your north & went from "sea to shining sea"
& had been British till quite recently, neither history nor
geography is a strong suit of yours but surely you realise that Mexico is
in North America?
What continent do you think it's on? Are you confusing the "Rio
Grande" with "Panama"? I can understand your confusion given
both have the letters "a" & "n" in them.
Mexico et al are part of "North America" so when we're discussing
"Europe" we out to also be discussing "North America".
Hey I see a North American country called Nicaragua is looking like
electing the same communist as president for a second time. I think his
name is "Daniel Ortega". Maybe you've heard of him?
"hola Daniel"
Adam
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786
@PATH: 379/45 1 633/267
|