| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Dollar losing influence |
From: Ad George Sherwood wrote: > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:43:53 +0000, Ad wrote: > >> George Sherwood wrote: >>> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:40:43 +0000, Adam wrote: >>> >>>> However I am obviously not about to name names period let alone in a >>>> public forum so you will just have to accept that it is hearsay. >>>> >>> Well look at the statistics, not hearsay. The education level has gone >>> down a little bit for the Army, but not in the drastic, picking up the >>> crack heads way that you implied. >>> >>> George >> I did no such thing. I merely pointed out that the Mil is a social >> program writ large & that they have dropped their entry criteria & this >> helps make it a better social program as it's now more inclusive. >> >> I'm not quite sure where your defensiveness comes from as certainly the >> PBI & the lower ranks of the navy have always been a way out for those >> in the lower rungs of society. >> >> I think the fact that you elide the lower rungs of society with >> crackheads is your problem not theirs. > > Your original statement: > > "The military is a social program writ large esp now they've dropped > their entry criteria." > > This statement wasn't met to say the military is now taking in the dregs > of society? Of course it was. I just pointed out that the standards have > actually been maintained pretty damn well considering a war is going on. > No it was meant to say exactly what it said. They have dropped the entry criteria & it is functioning as a social program. You're the one wandering off in eliding the those needing a social program with being crackheads. > Haven't heard much lately about missed recruiting or enlistments goals? > Why? Because they are making them. Enlistments in record numbers, not > withstanding you "data point" in the Atlanta airport on how all the > soldiers hated it and wanted out. > "Army moves to recruit more high school dropouts Posted on Mon, Oct. 03, 2005 By JOSEPH L. GALLOWAY Knight Ridder Newspapers WASHINGTON - Army Secretary Noel Harvey and vice chief of staff Gen. Richard Cody said Monday that the Army was using looser Defense Department rules that permitted it to sign up more high school dropouts and people who score lower on mental-qualification tests, but they denied that this meant it was lowering standards. Until Army recruiters began having trouble signing up enough recruits earlier this year, the Army had set minimum standards that were higher than those of the Defense Department. The Army has a recruiting shortfall of 6,000 to 8,000 soldiers over the past 12 months. It hasnƒ ™t fallen so short of its annual goal since 1979, several years after the Vietnam war. Harvey and Cody addressed the recruiting issue in news conferences during the annual convention of the Association of the U.S. Army. The Department of Defense "standards on qualification tests call for at least 60 percent Category 1 to 3 (the higher end of testing) and 4 percent Category 4," the lowest end, Harvey said. "The other services follow that standard and the Army National Guard always followed it as well. But the active Army chose a standard of 67 percent in Categories 1-3, and 2 percent Category 4." It now would use the Defense Department guidelines, he said. Cody said that increasing the number of people with General Education Diplomas allowed to enlist in the Army wasnƒ ™t really a lowering of standards. GEDs are certificates granted in lieu of high school diplomas to dropouts who can pass an examination. The Armyƒ ™s figures show 6.5 percent of all enlisted soldiers held GED certificates at the end of 2004, the last year statistics were available. The Army plans to keep its limit on new soldiers with GEDs at 10 percent in any year." Even the Army Secretary & vice chief of staff agree that the standards have been lowered. Maybe it's difficult to notice that in Azerbaijan but those fitting prosthetics & dealing with the wounded have noticed. > I don't have a problem. Some of my best Sailors over the last 20+ years > have come from the lower end of the educational/financial spectrum. I am > incredibly proud of what they have accomplished and what the military > allowed them to accomplish. > So they were ex-crackheads? Adam --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.