From: "Mark" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0165_01C6FEEB.9158E690
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

No, it's not as bad as I painted it Bob, there are only 12-14 million =
illegals here now (hopefully that's all), and I doubt a substantial =
number of them vote illegally. But their numbers increase by the hour = and
eventually they will all feel emboldened to vote (at the behest of =
whomever has a pet project in this county or that, along with the ACLU =
telling them to just do it, we'll sort it out for you later) and the =
numbers will eventually be sufficient to supplant the wishes of =
Americans.

What possible argument can you credibly promote against people proving =
who they are before they vote?  I can't think of a one. Hell, you have = to
show ID to open a bank account that you're depositing money into, why = in
a million years would you not have to show ID to vote?

  "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message =
news:454ae2bf$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  I don't think it is nearly as bad as you indicate.

  http://electionline.org/Default.aspx?tabid=3D364

  I wonder if anyone has done any good studies on how many illegal =
immigrants try and vote. I would think the last thing an illegal would =
want to do is call attention to himself .
    "Mark"  wrote in message =
news:454ae084$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    I don't think we disagree to any great degree on the need to verify =
ballots cast (but hell, we have to do some head-butting with the = election
only a few days away, yes?).=20

    I am, however, considerably more worried about verifying the =
eligibility of the voter in "podunk, state, USA" to cast his vote
at all = (regardless of his choice), than I am of the accuracy of a GI's
vote as = transmitted through channels.=20

    Why in the world is there so much resistance on the Dem side of the =
equation against having people prove they are who they say they are? I =
can think of no noble reason to fight any or all initiatives to have =
people show ID when they present themselves at the polls to cast a vote =
for the future of our country 

------=_NextPart_000_0165_01C6FEEB.9158E690
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








No, it's not as bad as I painted it =
Bob, there are=20
only 12-14 million illegals here now (hopefully that's all), and I doubt = a=20
substantial number of them vote illegally. But their numbers increase by = the=20
hour and eventually they will all feel emboldened to vote (at the behest = of=20
whomever has a pet project in this county or that, along with the ACLU = telling=20
them to just do it, we'll sort it out for you later) and the numbers = will=20
eventually be sufficient to supplant the wishes of =
Americans.
 
What possible argument can you
credibly =
promote=20
against people proving who they are before they vote?  I can't =
think of a=20
one. Hell, you have to show ID to open a bank account
that = you're=20
depositing money into, why in a million years would you not =
have to=20
show ID to vote?
 

  "Robert G Lewis" <r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>">mailto:r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net">r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>
=
wrote in=20
  message news:454ae2bf$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  I don't think it is nearly as bad as you=20
  indicate.
   
  http://election" target="new">http://election=">http://electionline.org/Default.aspx?tabid=3D364">http://election=
line.org/Default.aspx?tabid=3D364
   
  I wonder if anyone has done
any good studies =
on how=20
  many illegal immigrants try and vote. I would think the last thing an =
illegal=20
  would want to do is call attention to himself
<g>.
  

    "Mark" <nomail{at}hotmail.com>">mailto:nomail{at}hotmail.com">nomail{at}hotmail.com>
wrote =
in message=20
    news:454ae084$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    I don't think we disagree to any =
great degree=20
    on the need to verify ballots cast (but hell, we have to do =
some=20
    head-butting with the election only a few days away, yes?). =

     
    I am, however, considerably more =
worried about=20
    verifying the eligibility of the voter in "podunk, state, USA" to =
cast his=20
    vote at all (regardless of his choice), than I am of the accuracy of =
a GI's=20
    vote as transmitted through channels. 
     
    Why in the world is there so much =
resistance on=20
    the Dem side of the equation against having people prove they are =
who they=20
    say they are? I can think of no noble reason to fight any or all =
initiatives=20
    to have people show ID when they present themselves at the polls to =
cast a=20
    vote for the future of our country <are you happier having 20, =
30, or 40=20
    million illegals determining your future for you, even if every =
single one=20
    of our substantially smaller overall number of GI's votes were=20
    fraudulent? I'm not.>
    

       

------=_NextPart_000_0165_01C6FEEB.9158E690--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5