From: "Robert G Lewis" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C6FF2B.2849F550
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

They already have to show ID to vote in most if not all states. Nice = rant
though.
  "Mark"  wrote in message =
news:454ae9bd{at}w3.nls.net...
  No, it's not as bad as I painted it Bob, there are only 12-14 million =
illegals here now (hopefully that's all), and I doubt a substantial =
number of them vote illegally. But their numbers increase by the hour = and
eventually they will all feel emboldened to vote (at the behest of =
whomever has a pet project in this county or that, along with the ACLU =
telling them to just do it, we'll sort it out for you later) and the =
numbers will eventually be sufficient to supplant the wishes of =
Americans.

  What possible argument can you credibly promote against people proving =
who they are before they vote?  I can't think of a one. Hell, you have = to
show ID to open a bank account that you're depositing money into, why = in
a million years would you not have to show ID to vote?

    "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message =
news:454ae2bf$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    I don't think it is nearly as bad as you indicate.

    http://electionline.org/Default.aspx?tabid=3D364

    I wonder if anyone has done any good studies on how many illegal =
immigrants try and vote. I would think the last thing an illegal would =
want to do is call attention to himself .
      "Mark"  wrote in message =
news:454ae084$1{at}w3.nls.net...
      I don't think we disagree to any great degree on the need to =
verify ballots cast (but hell, we have to do some head-butting with the =
election only a few days away, yes?).=20

      I am, however, considerably more worried about verifying the =
eligibility of the voter in "podunk, state, USA" to cast his vote
at all = (regardless of his choice), than I am of the accuracy of a GI's
vote as = transmitted through channels.=20

      Why in the world is there so much resistance on the Dem side of =
the equation against having people prove they are who they say they are? =
I can think of no noble reason to fight any or all initiatives to have =
people show ID when they present themselves at the polls to cast a vote =
for the future of our country 

------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C6FF2B.2849F550
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








They already have to show ID to vote in most if not =
all=20
states. Nice rant though<g>.

  "Mark" <nomail{at}hotmail.com>=20">mailto:nomail{at}hotmail.com">nomail{at}hotmail.com>=20
  wrote in message news:454ae9bd{at}w3.nls.net...
  No, it's not as bad as I painted it =
Bob, there=20
  are only 12-14 million illegals here now (hopefully that's all), and I =
doubt a=20
  substantial number of them vote illegally. But their numbers increase =
by the=20
  hour and eventually they will all feel emboldened to vote (at the =
behest of=20
  whomever has a pet project in this county or that, along with the ACLU =
telling=20
  them to just do it, we'll sort it out for you later) and the numbers =
will=20
  eventually be sufficient to supplant the wishes of =
Americans.
   
  What possible argument can you =
credibly promote=20
  against people proving who they are before they vote?  I can't =
think of a=20
  one. Hell, you have to show ID to open a bank account that =
you're=20
  depositing money into, why in a million years would you not =
have to=20
  show ID to vote?
   
  

    "Robert G Lewis" <r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>">mailto:r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net">r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>
=
wrote in=20
    message news:454ae2bf$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    I don't think it is nearly as bad as you=20
    indicate.
     
    http://election" target="new">http://election=">http://electionline.org/Default.aspx?tabid=3D364">http://election=
line.org/Default.aspx?tabid=3D364
     
    I wonder if anyone has done any good =
studies on how=20
    many illegal immigrants try and vote. I would think the last thing =
an=20
    illegal would want to do is call attention to himself=20
<g>.
    

      "Mark" <nomail{at}hotmail.com>">mailto:nomail{at}hotmail.com">nomail{at}hotmail.com>
=
wrote in=20
      message news:454ae084$1{at}w3.nls.net...
      I don't think we disagree to any =
great degree=20
      on the need to verify ballots cast (but hell, we have to do =
some=20
      head-butting with the election only a few days away, yes?). =

       
      I am, however, considerably more =
worried=20
      about verifying the eligibility of the voter in "podunk, state, =
USA" to=20
      cast his vote at all (regardless of his choice), than I am of the =
accuracy=20
      of a GI's vote as transmitted through channels. 
       
      Why in the world is
there so much =
resistance=20
      on the Dem side of the equation against having people prove they =
are who=20
      they say they are? I can think of no noble reason to fight any or =
all=20
      initiatives to have people show ID when they present themselves at =
the=20
      polls to cast a vote for the future of our country <are you =
happier=20
      having 20, 30, or 40 million illegals determining your future for =
you,=20
      even if every single one of our substantially smaller overall =
number=20
      of GI's votes were fraudulent? I'm
not.>
      

         

------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C6FF2B.2849F550--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5