From: hheagy@delphi.com
Subject: Re: Conflict of Interest
As I pointed out in another post, we are supposed to be an
interactive consumer organization; led by the national but not
dominated or controlled by it.  There is a difference.
I also agree that Roberts Rules of Procedure should not be used
to circumvent the will of the convention, but neither should
intimidation tactics.  Shouldn't we be allowed to state our
disagreement with the national leadership or with individuals
thereof without fear of reprisal or intimidation as long as we do
not engage in public personal attacks?  Why should we have to
fear writing a disagreeing letter because it later may be used in
a leadership seminar, or in a Monitor, or banquet address or
presidential release?  And take my word, no matter what is said
about sensitive information being used in seminars, it always
gets back to the people involved.
As far as the resolution about the National Center, I think that
is a classic example of when a resolution should be sent to the
floor without prejudice so that a true decision of the convention
can be arrived at.  I personally will not support a national
center as long as there are civil rights cases left untouched due
to lack of funds.
Harvey
Net-Tamer V 1.10 Beta  - Registered
---
---------------