| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: enemy combatant but not unlawful? |
From: Ad If you invade a country you will always find difficulties wrt making out those fighting the invasion are not combatants but criminals. The SS took that view & many were hung as a result. Adam Rich Gauszka wrote: > Wonder if Bush needs a chauffeur? > > http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/06/04/ap3787236.html > > Military judges dismissed charges Monday against a Guantanamo detainee > accused of chauffeuring Osama bin Laden and another who allegedly killed > a U.S. soldier in Afghanistan, throwing up roadblocks to the Bush > administration's attempt to try terror suspects in military courts. > > In back-to-back arraignments for Salim Ahmed Hamdan of Yemen and > Canadian Omar Khadr the U.S. military's cases against the alleged > al-Qaida figures dissolved because, the two judges said, the government > had failed to establish jurisdiction. > > They were the only two of the roughly 380 prisoners at Guantanamo > charged with crimes, and the rulings stand to complicate efforts by the > United States to try other suspected al-Qaida and Taliban figures in > military courts. > > Hamdan's military judge, Navy Capt. Keith Allred, said the detainee is > "not subject to this commission" under legislation passed by Congress > and signed by President Bush last year. Hamdan is accused of > chauffeuring bin Laden's and being the al-Qaida chief's bodyguard. > > Defense attorneys argued that the new Military Commissions Act, written > to establish military trials after the U.S. Supreme Court last year > rejected the previous system, is full of problems. > > The judges agreed that there was one problem they could not resolve - > the new legislation says only "unlawful enemy combatants" can be tried > by the military trials, known as commissions. But Khadr and Hamdan had > previously been identified by military panels only as enemy combatants, > lacking the critical "unlawful" designation. > > The surprise decisions do not spell freedom for the detainees, who are > imprisoned here along with about 380 other men suspected of links to > al-Qaida and the Taliban. > > Khadr was 15 when he was captured after a firefight in Afghanistan in > 2002 in which he allegedly killed a U.S. soldier and was wounded > himself. He is now 20. > > Khadr, appearing in the courtroom with a beard and wearing an > olive-green prison uniform, seemed uninterested when the judge, Army > Col. Peter Brownback, threw out the case. Khadr focused on his own image > on a computer screen that showed a live TV broadcast of the proceedings. > > The chief of military defense attorneys at Guantanamo Bay, Marine Col. > Dwight Sullivan, said the dismissal of the case against Khadr could > spell the end of the war-crimes trial system hurriedly set up last year > by Congress and Bush after the Supreme Court threw out the previous system. > > But legal experts said Brownback apparently left open the door for a > retrial for Khadr, and that the Defense Department can possibly fix the > jurisdictional problem by holding new "combat status review tribunals" > for any detainee headed to trial. > > Sullivan said the dismissal has "huge" impact because none of the > detainees held at this isolated military base in southeast Cuba has been > found to be an "unlawful" enemy combatant. > > "It is not just a technicality; it's the latest demonstration that this > newest system just does not work," Sullivan told journalists. "It is a > system of justice that does not comport with American values." > > The Military Commissions Act specifically says that only those > classified as "unlawful" enemy combatants can face war trials here, > Brownback noted. > > The distinction is important because if they were "lawful," they would > be entitled to prisoner of war status, which under the Geneva > Conventions would entitle them to the same treatment under established > military law that U.S. soldiers would get. > > A Pentagon spokesman said the issue was little more than semantics. > > Navy Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon told The Associated Press said the entire > Guantanamo system was set up to deal with people who act as "unlawful > enemy combatants," operating outside any internationally recognized > military, without uniforms, military ranks or other things that make > them party to the Geneva Conventions. > > "It is our belief that the concept was implicit that all the Guantanamo > detainees who were designated as 'enemy combatants' ... were in fact > unlawful," Gordon said. > > Sullivan said that reclassifying detainees as "unlawful," will require a > time-consuming overhaul of the whole system. But Gregory McNeal, a law > professor at Pennsylvania State University, said nothing prevents the > Defense Department from reconvening hearings for detainees headed to > trial and declaring them to be "unlawful" combatants. > > Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond, said a > retrial is possible because Brownback dismissed the case without prejudice. > > Prosecuting attorneys in both cases indicated they would appeal the > dismissals. But the court designated to hear the appeals - known as the > court of military commissions review - doesn't even exist yet, Sullivan > noted. > > At the Khadr family home in Toronto, Khadr's sister Zaynab said she > hoped the ruling would lead to his release. > > "It seems like good news. I guess someone is starting to actually look > at the charges and at him as a person rather than just the fact he's > allegedly the enemy of the United States," the 27-year-old said in a > telephone interview. > > U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, said he plans to hold > hearings on the Military Commissions Act, which he said is "riddled with > problems and created a process that operates outside the rule of law - > it has crippled our ability to deal with the real criminals still being > held at Guantanamo." > > The only other detainee charged under the new system, Australian David > Hicks, pleaded guilty in March to providing material support to al-Qaida > and is serving a nine-month sentence in Australia. Sullivan said the > dismissal of the Khadr case raised questions about the legitimacy of > Hicks' conviction. > > Brownback ruled only minutes into Khadr's arraignment on charges of > murder in violation of the law of war, attempted murder in violation of > the law of war, conspiracy, providing material support for terrorism and > spying. > > "The charges are dismissed without prejudice," Brownback pronounced. > > A prosecutor, Army Capt. Keith Petty, said he had been prepared to show > Khadr was an unlawful combatant because he fought for al-Qaida, and > videotapes showed Khadr making and planting explosives targeting > American soldiers. > > The U.S. military has hoped to accelerate its prosecutions of Guantanamo > detainees, with the Pentagon saying it expects to eventually charge > about 80 of the 380 prisoners held at this isolated base. Now, delays > seem likely. > > The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Hamdan last June when it threw out > the previous military tribunal system, set up in the wake of the Sept. > 11, 2001, attacks. Congress quickly responded with new guidelines for > war-crimes trials that Bush signed into law. > > Hamdan was charged with conspiracy for his alleged membership in > al-Qaida, his purported role in plotting to attack civilians and > civilian targets, and material support for terrorism - he is accused of > transporting at least one SA-7 surface-to-air missile to shoot down U.S. > and coalition military aircraft in Afghanistan in November 2001. > > __ > --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.