CH>RT>Its all a matter of power Charles.  If I don't exercise my power to ID
  >  >your call, MY privacy is being invaded... If I do, you feel that YOUR
  >  >privacy is being invaded.  As long as I'm the one with the power to
  >  >protect my home, you lose.  If you don't want me to know who you are,
  >  >don't call me.  If I need to talk to you, I'll do the calling.
CH>I don't have a problem with that Ron.  My only point is that the
  >caller-id device, as it is used, makes society more reclusive and
  >anti social.
I disagree...  IMO, it help to avoid anti-social methods of avoiding
bothersome people who you don't want to talk to.
Telephone solicitors with sequential dialers have taken what once was an
extension of the community meeting room and turned it into yet another
bothersome commercial pest.  Caller-ID is one solution to the problem.
---
 þ QMPro 1.02 42-7029 þ (A)bort, (R)etry, (S)mack the @#$&*~ thing!
---------------