::>  > what about _splitpath() and _makepath()? Are the Ansi/ISO/Posix? They 

::>  > the same thing and seem to be more recognized (Borland and Watcom at
::>  > least).
::>   Yes, they are pretty much the same thing, but no, they're not standard
::> functions either.
Didn't think so. I started using them when I had to deal with Watcom and it 
didn't recognize Borland's fnsplit(). They worked under both. 
I also found that in many, if not all instances, fnsplit() wrecked the string 
it was supposed to split and I would have to perform an fnmerge on it with 
the 
components to get it back. Dunno why it did that though :(
#  Herbert Bushong    harchon@centuryinter.net       [TEAM OS/2]    
-  Blackbeard's BBS   Intelec: 239:600/0            
+  Fido: 1:19/19      http://www.intelec.com/software/
---
   RM 1.31 2508   Flash!  Suicidal twin kills sister by mistake!
---------------