MS>      This is an addendum to "Pure DOS TelNet ZMoDem" of
 MS> October 16:

ML>> ...i (finally) saw that you had uploaded a private package to me, a
ML>> long while back, of kermit stuffs...  i've not had time to try to do
ML>> anything with it and have never been asked about kermit...  ...you
ML>> still wanting to do/try something with it on my OS/2 system, too??
MS>> I didn't change my mind about what it's worth...  ...though, i
MS>> confess i forgot what's in the archive...

 MS>      I paid a visit to your BBS yesterday, there's no .QWK
 MS> door

right... all offline mail doors were removed until my software settles down
enough for an offline door to work with it... some things have changed in
the data structures that make things not compatible...

 MS> and much less a `Kermit' option...

never did have a kermit option... what you sent is/was to be the first ever
on the system...

 MS> I wasn't able to locate the archive i sent to you

because you marked it as "sysop's eyes only" ;)

 MS> and i found no `Kermit' option in the file section neither.

same protcol selection in the entire system...

 MS> There's a long way to go before we can resume course and
 MS> reverse twenty years of negative re-inforcement;  once you
 MS> got `Kermit' installed and well set i would advise that you
 MS> use patience (try twenty more years) but the users must see
 MS> it work first and we're not there yet, as far as i'm
 MS> concerned!

i believe i understand... i was just not wanting you to be jaded about
sending some info this way and then nothing ever being done with it...

my biggest problem is to decide if i should go with native OS/2 flavor of
whatever or go with a DOS flavor... DOS stuff generally just drops right
in... OS/2 stuff has a few tricks that are needed at times...

it can be rather rough running a salt'n'pepper system ;)

)\/(ark