-> 
MSGID: 1:373/9 000195b6
-> -=> On 02-06-98  15:00, Matt Munson did testify and affirm <=-
-> -=> to All concerning Suggestion <=-
->  MM> For the independent council, aganst clinton, i had an idea
->  MM> to prevent conflict of intrest. how about a pannel of 4
->  MM> majority house/senate members and 3 minority house/senate
->  MM> members and we will have no conflict of intrest when we
->  MM> investigate a president again...
-> Matt, there is NO conflict of interest. If Starr were any
-> more neutral, he'd be sitting on the DNC. As Rush stated
-> today many, if not a majority, of Starr's staff attorneys
-> are Democrats.
-> More to the point, if you will think back to the
-> vilification and expulsion of Packwood, there was a
-> question as to whether admission of his diaries into
-> evidence was a violation of his privacy. The majority
-> Democrats solution was to pick a neutral attorney to review
-> those diaries and determine which portions were admissable.
-> As I recollect, that neutral attorney picked by the
-> Democrat majority was: Kenneth Starr.
I understand that, but the media is washing my brain 
We need to give the media lobotomies :)
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0
---------------