From: Adam Flinton 

Gene McAloon wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 00:38:44 +0100, Adam Flinton 
> wrote:
>
>
>>Gee & if it had been a marine prison then the cia would have been
>>banned...nope maybe that was a USAF prison...what crap. Heck they ran
>>the place in part on "civilian contractors" who "in
theory" were neither
>>DoD nor CIA nor indeed of any specific US gov dept.
>>
>>Plausible deniability was broken by the poor reservists who didn't
>>understand the rules of the game wrt photos.
>
>
> It is obvious you don't have a clue about this stuff.

ROFLMAO.

> The prison in question is
> run by the US Army which is part of the Defense Dept.

Gosh really? Gee whiz...are they the guys wot dress in green & have guns?

> The CIA is an entirely
> autonomous agency and neither can or does interfere with the other.

Ah right. So they're not "fighting together in the war on terror"
then? This is as much bollox as the US Embassy in Amman having no CIA, only
"agriculture department officals" even though the place is a
forest of aerials & odd people who know very little about growing
stuff.

Gee Gene I suppose next you're going to tell me that Iraq has such a deep
need for an agricultural overhaul that Baghdad too is completely lacking in
CIA but well staffed with agriculture departments people.

Maybe the FDA & the US parks service also have people there.


> If the Army
> doesn't want the CIA in its prison, they will not be present. It is as simple
as
> that.
>

Bollox. You are either (a) ignorant (b) disengenous or (c) naive.

Who's their boss? Oh right they all serve the same master & have the
same aims given to them by the US executive.

> The "contract" people are not CIA people in civilian clothes.

A fair few of them will be. Ooops I mean they are agriculture department
doing some "intense interrogation" wrt "local agricultural
practices".

A fair few will be ex Special forces who can get paid 5 years salary in 6
months & then following their "sabbatical" can oddly enough
rejoin the armed forces as if they had never been away.

> They are employees
> of private companies hired by various government departments.

Gee just like Gary Powers then.

> The contractors,
> if indeed there were any, in that prison would have been hired by some office
or
> group in the Defense Dept or perhaps by the Army itself. This kind of
> privatization of work previously done by the military itself has accelerated
> enormously under Bush, the impetus having come primarily form the former
> Secretary of the Army who pushed it heavily.
>

It has always happened. No airforce people in or involved with the U2
either, oh no it was all  "civilian contractors".

> Get a clue, Adam, and stop demonstrating your anti-US bigotry induced
ignorance.
> It long ago became . . . tiresome.
>

ROFLMAO. How is any of the above "anti-US bigotry"? You are
simply ignorant You try & hide that beneath a veneer of bigotry &
then when both are noted you resort to the above. Sad really.

Adam


Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5