In article 
Gremlin  wrote:

[Top Posted because of length and breadth of EMPTY THREATS by
DUCKFARTER, HE WHO FARTS THREATS ON THE HOUR, EVERY HOUR.]

Jax, BD - PLEASE frigg'n BEG him to post those damn MIDS, or by the
time he posts them we're all going to have died of old age!

Kee-rist! I'll bet the guy who hammered the nails into Jesus had less
excuses for what he did than does this creep. Someone ought to gather
and publish A Collection Of Papers on Ultimate Projection and Denial
As Practiced by Dustin Cook, aka, The DuckFarter.

>
> Default F1  news:m7n25q$dg4$1@speranza.aioe.org
> Sat, 27 Dec 2014 19:43:58 GMT in alt.politics.scorched-earth, wrote:
>
> > On 12/27/2014 01:00 PM, BurfordTJustice wrote:
> >> Why david brooks (Devon) you just said Jenn is ugly.
> >> What a lousy prick of a friend you make.
> >>
> >> tsk! tsk!
> >
> > Does he always tell the truth.   
> >
>
> According to you, BD and Jax are upstanding examples of truth seekers
> who seek only to write the truth for us all. Most of the regulars know
> those lines are pure horse#### and you've admitted being nothing more
> than a troll after having expressing such an assinine opinion of them.
>
> BD is despised in newsgroups I've never even posted in. His reputation
> is worse than mine; including the viruses/hacking I've been
> responsible for. he's known only as a liar and stalker. He libels, he
> slimes, he stalks. Jax does the same. Jax goes farther, it solicited
> the help of others to acquire personal background information on
> specific posters. It specifically stated that it didn't care how the
> information was acquired; making a note to let us all know legal or
> illegally obtained information was good to it.
>
> These are a few small examples of the types of people you've
> previously tried to pass off as truthful and respectable in some way
> shape or form.
>
> BD has gone so far as to make fun of cancer survivors and then later,
> when caught, try to claim it was a joke meant in fun. BD has copyright
> infringed on several posters established copyrights. When called out
> on this, he explains that better protection should have been used to
> keep him from doing it. All the while, he gets on his high horse and
> complains about the activities HHI is involved in. HHI releases non
> exact duplicates of the original. BD lifted the original from a
> private site he had no permission to be exploring, and uploaded these
> pictures on another site that he has control over.
>
> None of those are examples of a truth seeker, but one who bends the
> truth and lies on others to justify his own bad actions.
>
> He likes to paint me as a bad guy claiming I break federal laws on a
> near daily basis, but he likes to ignore his copyright infringing, his
> own stalking efforts, his attempts to doc drop people as well as his
> attempts to try and google search #### them by associating their name
> with things they didn't actually do. OR, if they did something he's
> claimed, it wasn't exactly how he claimed it happened.
>
> Jax has attempted to stalk my moms possible place of
> employment/business owned and libel her with nasty accusations of
> insecure medications. On numerous occasions it attempted to claim I
> was stealing vet meds.
>
> It found a vet local to this are and proceeded to trash them, wrongly
> thinking my mom either owned the place outright or worked for them.
>
> One of the questions I'd asked of it was in reference to those posts;
> which I did save the MIDs for. Jax won't lockin it's answers to my
> questions because if it tells the truth, it's a proven liar. If it
> lies and I post the MIDs as promised, it's proven as a liar. The
> questions aren't rigged, but they are designed to show regardless of
> the yes or the no, that the person is a liar.
>
> They can't spin it, they can't deflect it, so they choose NOT to
> answer my questions and bluff their way out of the accusations with
> the MID reference. Every single time I post the questions, I write
> that I have the MIDs and I will post them, I just need it to lock in
> four yes or no questions beforehand.
>
> Shouldn't be a problem. :) It knows I have MIDs supporting all four
> questions. It might even have a good idea which posts I'm planning to
> provide, so it's not about to answer my questions. it knows either
> answer ####s its credibility; One more so than the other. To deny the
> questions once the MIDs (and they do exist) are posted will show
> without any possible doubt it lied on every single one of them.
>
> To be honest and answer them, before the MIDs are even posted is to
> admit to having lied on all four of the presented questions; this is
> actually the most honorable option it has at this point. Yes, it lied,
> but it can accept responsibility for it and move on.
>
> It's only way to dodge being rightfully tagged as a known liar is to
> continue to refuse to answer any of the questions and try to direct
> your attention to my refusal to post MIDs. I haven't refused, I will
> post them, once it locks in an answer to each question. it thinks it's
> got me, but all it's doing is proving it's unable to truthfully answer
> those questions. :)
>
> The only other option it has, is to continue evading answering the
> questions and try to convince you into thinking it's all made up. it
> hopes and prays you don't notice that each time, I offer to provide
> the MIDs, it only has to say yes or no to four simple questions first.
> It's known this the entire time. It cannot answer the questions
> without showing ALL of you that it lied on each and every single one
> of them.
>
> It doesn't even have the honor of accepting that it lied and got
> caught, but wants to do the right thing now.
>
> It knows they exist, it took great pains to post articles discussing
> financial issues the selected vets office has. It accused me of
> stealing meds from that vets office. Not only making me out to be a
> thief, but claiming their doctoring medical records and/or
> participating in my acquiring them, since they're controlled drugs.
>
> You cannot realistically defend those actions and claim the people
> doing it are truth seekers in any way shape or form. You must expect
> the people reading our posts are extremely gullible and can't figure
> things out for themselves. I say you're seriously underestimating the
> reading audience when you do this.
>
> Your posting habit and writing style actually remind me of OG38.
>
> --
> My truck does not leak. It's just marking its territory!

--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2