From: Adam Flinton 

Gene McAloon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 20:39:54 -0400, "Geo."
 wrote:
>
>
>>"Gene McAloon"  wrote in message
>>news:42c1c0tmoqr8edrfljtbjnm6sd4gs9u5nd{at}4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>>Naw, you have got it all wrong, Geo. The abuse at the Baghdad
prison didn't
>>
>>even
>>
>>>start until the Army intelligence crew from Gitmo got there
with orders to
>>
>>apply
>>
>>>the same methods being used at Gitmo. According to media
reports, the local
>>
>>CIA
>>
>>>station chief in Baghdad, upon hearing that, withdrew his people from the
>>>Baghdad prison.
>>
>>The tactics used were CIA all the way Gene. The CIA even referred to the army
>>people at the prison as hillbilly and from the pictures and what I've heard
of
>>interviews with them that's far too accurate a description to be
cooincidence.
>
>
> You misunderstood that reference. One of the reasons the CIA withdrew its
people
> from the prison was becasue it feard what a bunch of hillbilly guards would
do
> if allowed to use warming up techniques.
>

ROFLMAO. The thing they were worried about was appearing in these photos.


>>>In any case, both the Gitmo and Baghdad prisons are run by the
Army, not the
>>>CIA.
>>
>>Except for the wing where all the torture took place.
>
>
> Wrong again, Geo. It was an Army prison, the Army ran it. The paticular wings
> you are referring to were run by the Army Intelligence people, in contrast to
> the rest of the prison run by MPs.
>

Gee & if it had been a marine prison then the cia would have been
banned...nope maybe that was a USAF prison...what crap. Heck they ran the
place in part on "civilian contractors" who "in theory"
were neither DoD nor CIA nor indeed of any specific US gov dept.

Plausible deniability was broken by the poor reservists who didn't
understand the rules of the game wrt photos.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5