From: Gene McAloon 

On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 00:38:44 +0100, Adam Flinton
 wrote:

>Gee & if it had been a marine prison then the cia would have been
>banned...nope maybe that was a USAF prison...what crap. Heck they ran
>the place in part on "civilian contractors" who "in
theory" were neither
>DoD nor CIA nor indeed of any specific US gov dept.
>
>Plausible deniability was broken by the poor reservists who didn't
>understand the rules of the game wrt photos.

It is obvious you don't have a clue about this stuff. The prison in
question is run by the US Army which is part of the Defense Dept. The CIA
is an entirely autonomous agency and neither can or does interfere with the
other. If the Army doesn't want the CIA in its prison, they will not be
present. It is as simple as
that.

The "contract" people are not CIA people in civilian clothes.
They are employees
of private companies hired by various government departments. The
contractors, if indeed there were any, in that prison would have been hired
by some office or
group in the Defense Dept or perhaps by the Army itself. This kind of
privatization of work previously done by the military itself has
accelerated enormously under Bush, the impetus having come primarily form
the former Secretary of the Army who pushed it heavily.

Get a clue, Adam, and stop demonstrating your anti-US bigotry induced ignorance.
It long ago became . . . tiresome.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5