-=> On 02-07-98  09:45, Mike Angwin did testify and affirm <=-
-=> to Matt Munson concerning Re: Suggestion <=-
 MM> For the independent council, aganst clinton, i had an idea
 MM> to prevent conflict of intrest. how about a pannel of 4
 MM> majority house/senate memb and 3 minority house/senate
 MM> members and we will have no conflict of int when we
 MM> investigate a president again... 
 MA> I really don't believe a conflict of interest exists with
 MA> Judge Starr who himself was selected by Janet Reno to
 MA> conduct the investigation. 
Not to mention the fact that in 1992-3, the Senate
*Democratic* majority was so convinced of Starr's
polictical neutrality that they selected him to review
Packwood's diaries to determine which portions were
admissible.
Nor has the media pointed out that one of the attorneys
accompanying Starr to the Grand Jury is Sam Dash, the lead
attorney for Sam Ervin during the impeachment of Richard
Nixon and someone who is hardly a member of the right-wing
conspiracy.
 MA> What we are experiencing is another of those Slick Willy
 MA> type diversions to shift public attention from himself to
 MA> someone else. I would not at all put it beyond the Clinton
 MA> administration itself to being the source of the "leaks" in
 MA> an attempt to discredit Judge Starr and focus everyone on
 MA> the investigator rather than upon the person being
 MA> investigated. 
[...snip...]
Michael Isikoff(sp?) has stated that his leaks came from
the Clinton Defense Team. 
... Ididn'tdoitYoudidn'tseemedoitYoucan'tproveanything.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
--- PCBoard (R) v15.22/5
---------------