| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Revolutionary Evoluti |
Tim Tyler wrote:
> John Wilkins wrote or quoted:
> > wrote:
> > > Tim Tyler wrote:
>
> > > >Yes it does. The species is divided geographically - and then
> > > >diverges due to drift and/or differing selection
pressures - and over
> > > >time that causes mating incompatibilities with members of the
> > > >ancestral population - and results in a new species.
> > >
> > > Most scientist belief that. But why should a population split by a
> > > geographical barrier while slowly adapting become unable to mate? Do
> > > the Europeans show mating incompatibilities with the American Indian
> > > or the Australian Aborigine? Man has done a thorough job breading dogs
> > > apart but most still happily mate and produce offspring.
> >
> > Incompatibilities accrue over time - random changes tend to make each
> > population diverge if the population size is small enough. Moreover,
> > many incompatibilities arise as byproducts of selection to local
> > conditions - for example, in sparse environments there may be selection
> > pressure for shorter gestation; if this is bred with the older
> > developmental cycle genes, then the result may be inviable.
> >
> > But a very small amount of gene flow can maintain compatibilities - I
> > read once as little as one percent er annum can keep two populations
> > homogenous in that respect. I can't attest to that, but it is pretty
> > small. Others will be able to fill that lacuna in.
>
> Theis is what is conventionally known at the
> "One-Migrant-per-Generation Rule".
>
> In theory, one indivdial per generation migrating between two sexual
> groups is enough to prevent their gene pools diverging.
>
> The figure is independent of the population size.
>
> In practice, lack of random assortment within the groups results in
> the number of migrants that are possible while retaining group-level
> characteristics to be larger - but the point is clear nontheless - a
> "suprisingly low" between-group migration rate is needed before two
> almost-isolated groups will diverge very far from one another.
Thanks you. Of course, this depends on the two populations being
compatible to begin with - hybrid genes can fail to introgress if they
are less fit or viable. I really must work through this at a textbook
level sometime...
--
John Wilkins
john_SPAM{at}wilkins.id.au http://www.wilkins.id.au
"Men mark it when they hit, but do not mark it when they miss"
- Francis Bacon
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com
---
* RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
* RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 4/16/04 12:05:31 PM
* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.