| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | RE: [R_Catholic-L] France & Louisiana |
To:
From: "Vern Humphrey"
Reply-To: r_catholic-l{at}yahoogroups.com
To: goffscalif{at}aol.com [mailto:goffscalif{at}aol.com]
>
> > Assumptions that are quite reasonable -- Old Hickory might have
> been rough
> > and uncouth, but he had a lifetime of fighting experience in America.
> > Whereas the British really did the best they could. Flanking
> movements and
> > seiges are more easily spoken of than executed in battle.
>
> Especially given the terrain on which they fought the Battle of
> New Orleans.
> The American position had its right on the Mississippi River -
> very difficult
> to turn that flank. The other flank rested on what was
> essentially swampland
> - again, difficult to turn (especially since the British had just
> finished
> slogging through swamps to get there and were in consequence
> exhausted). To get
> to the American position, it was necessary to cross several
> canals, mostly
> small but at least one fairly large. I'm not tactician, but I
> would not want to
> have to assault that American position, even if I had regulars
> while they had
> a rather two-by-four army (as was indeed the case).
Essentially, the British were partially defeated by the terrain.
Communications was another problem -- they could not coordinate their
efforts under such conditions.
>
> Assuming a practical way to do it, the best thing the British
> could have done
> would have been to cross the river and bypass the Americans.
> They probably
> would have, too, had it been practical, but it wasn't - the other
> side of the
> Mississippi was wilderness. The British did try to bypass the American
> position on the river, but came under fire from the levee and had
> to abandon the
> attempt.
The great danger of a bypass operation is that you expose your flank, and
leave an unmolested enemy in your rear. The British did not have the
capability to suppress and fix the American positions.
>
> Maneuver is great if you can do it. But if your only choice is a direct
> assault across open ground on fortified positions whose defenders
> are firing from
> cover, you're going to suffer even if you win, for all the
> advantage lies with
> the defenders.
>
Correct.
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Where Catholic Singles Go Online - StRaphael.net is the world's #1 website
for single Catholics. If you are looking for friendship, marriage or even a
religious vocation, StRaphael.cnet is the place to be. Join Today Free!
www.StRaphael.net
http://us.click.yahoo.com/r_NezC/1M1FAA/EDtLAA/28VolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Visit R_Catholic-L member homepages at: http://home.cox.rr.com/rraphael
http://rcatholic-l.freeservers.com
http://hometown.aol.com/philvaz
http://www.lisaslighthouse.org
http://members.aol.com/SisterNeri/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/100)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/100 101 1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.