-=> On 02-15-98  15:46, John Sampson did testify and affirm <=-
-=> to Robert Craft concerning Dufus' Waterloo? <=-
 
 JS> Why now? Because as U.S. News and World Report said, the
 JS> American people in effect said we had a deal. We would not
 JS> look at his past as long as he behaved in the future. He
 JS> breached his end of the bargain. This is no B.S. This is
 JS> what was printed in the above publication. 
 
 RC> I think that's an accurate point. The Dufus made an
 RC> implicit promise in that 1992 Superbowl 60 Minutes
 RC> appearance that all such activities were behind him. 
 JS> That was the thrust of the article in U.S. News and World
 JS> Report. No "pun" intended . Don Imus on CNBC made a very
 JS> good point. The American people knowingly elected a
 JS> philanderer and he was only keeping up his part of the
 JS> bargain. 
But... that philanderer promised he had reformed and he
wouldn't be unfaithful in the future. It's *that* broken
promise that may yet arouse the ire of the voters.
[...snip...]
 JS> Have you noticed that the political allies of Dufus have
 JS> been VERY silent? I mean the likes of Patricia Ireland, the
 JS> rest of NOW, Jackson, Mfume, Sharpton, etc. 
Well, Sharpton is busy treading water at his trial for
defamation of Pagones in the Tawana Brawley case. 
... All's fair in love And war.  What A Contemptible Lie! - RAH
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
--- PCBoard (R) v15.22/5
---------------