-=> On 02-15-98  11:04, John Sampson did testify and affirm <=-
-=> to All concerning A new theory <=-
 JS> Someone, I can't remember who exactly, brought up the
 JS> possibility that this is a big "hoax" by Monica Lewinsky. 
 JS> As improbable as this may sound, let me offer up an
 JS> alternative theory. 
 JS> The Paula Jones civil lawsuit is coming up for trial in
 JS> May. What if, this was a very elaborate attempt by the
 JS> White House and Uncle Bob to totally innundate the public
 JS> before the trial with sexual escapades so as to make 
 JS> whatever comes out of the trial seem "old news" and get the
 JS> public to say: "So what?" or "Big deal."
 JS> It may also serve to make the prosecution of this civil
 JS> suit more difficult since everything has already come out
 JS> in the press. It may very well explain the leaks and where
 JS> they're coming from. Thomas Sowell in his syndicated column
 JS> has stated that the ONLY person who benefits from all these
 JS> leaks is William Jefferson Clinton. No one else and most
 JS> certainly not Kenneth Starr. 
 JS> Comments?
Nice try, John - it's truly an effort worthy of member of
the right wing conspiracy. 
But.. there's one problem: it doesn't make much sense to
commit two felonies - perjury and obstruction of justice -
just to evade a civil tort? Nah...
At any rate, I think the corroboration of the Lewinsky
findings is such that the possibility of hoax is somewhere
around that of finding iced tea in Hell. 
... Liberals are blind & deaf.  We're workin' on mute.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20
--- PCBoard (R) v15.22/5
---------------