From: Adam Flinton 

Geo. wrote:

> "Phil Payne"  wrote in message
> news:40D53C28.886E612F{at}isham-research.com...
>
>
>>>not even on aug 7th 1945?
>>
>>No, I don't think so.  One of my uncles was a prisoner of war in the Far
>>East - Japanese behaviour was well-documented here at the time and shortly
>>afterwards.  I'm ne of those who feels bringing that war to an end as
>>rapidly as possible was worth the cost.  These days, people talk about an
>>imminent Japanese surrender - but who was to know, even if it was true?
>
>
> So you didn't have a problem with nuking japan and killing a hundred thousand
> innocents but blowing up an armed wedding party is a problem? I don't follow?
> Is it just that you don't believe this whole war on terror thing is really
like
> a war? I mean I admit it's a bit weird since there is no one country to tag
as
> the enemy but there is most definitely an enemy that needs to be dealt with.
>
It's called a police action.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5