To: 
From: "Vern Humphrey" 
Reply-To: r_catholic-l{at}yahoogroups.com

To: seanmbrook{at}aol.com [mailto:seanmbrook{at}aol.com]
> >
> > VH> What is in dispute is not the facts of her death, but the
> attitudes about
> > it.  None of us killed her, nor even saw her death.  But some
> here on this
> > echo took the position that she deserved to die.
> >
>  I saw no one here who argued or said Rachel Corrie
>  deserved to die under a bulldozer.  What's disputed
>  are the facts of how she died.

From some of the posts I read, I got the impression there was a "she
brought it on herself" attitude.
> >
>  The mere text of the US Constitution is not part
>  of the deposit of faith.  You have in mind those parts
>  of the Constitution which based itself on natural
>  law and universal principles like simple justice.
>
Which is to say, in very close correspondence with what we hold through faith.

Is there any part of the Constitution itself which a Catholic is obliged to reject?


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Where Catholic Singles Go Online - StRaphael.net is the world's #1 website
for single Catholics. If you are looking for friendship, marriage or even a
religious vocation, StRaphael.cnet is the place to be. Join Today Free!
www.StRaphael.net
http://us.click.yahoo.com/r_NezC/1M1FAA/EDtLAA/28VolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Visit R_Catholic-L member homepages at: http://home.cox.rr.com/rraphael
http://rcatholic-l.freeservers.com
http://hometown.aol.com/philvaz
http://www.lisaslighthouse.org
http://members.aol.com/SisterNeri/


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4