Raymond Lau wrote in a message to Kim Forwood:
 KF> Have you considered the possibility that it may be you that
 KF> is too simple, rather than the language that you are unable
 KF> to comprehend?
 RL> No, I really can't be bother. I've done the damn program in less
 RL> than two minute. PAScal...why is it even invented!!!  
Typical, poor worker always blames his tools, even when he has the best at 
his side.
 RL> It's worst than the coming of win98. Or the so called developed 
 RL> WIn95.
Now, nothing can be that bad! :-) 
 KF> It certainly *is* possible to write your simple little
 KF> program in Pascal. The problem here is that you want somebody
 KF> else to write it for you because you can't do it yourself,
 KF> yet nobody is interested in writing it for you. Does putting
 KF> down Pascal make you feel better about your own inadequacies,
 KF> or is that just immature whining?
 RL> Don't try to teach me you know nothing about.
I'd say she knows a hell of a lot more about programming than you do. When 
was the last time you released a massive program (or for that matter even a 
minor one)? When was the last time you wrote a program with over 20,000 lines 
of code? (What's the count up to now Kim?)
 RL> Pascal may be easy and simple and useless. It does not mean you
 RL> have either master it or understand it. I bet you have never even
 RL> use pascal before in your whole life.
Um, even the dumbest of idiots could, at a quick glance at Kim's messages in 
here, see that she is quite familliar with Pascal. If they had any doubts 
they could simply test her programs out and see that a) they compiled and b) 
they did the required job (well, most of the time anyway).
Don't blame or abuse others for your shortcomings. You'll do a lot better in 
life if you learn exactly where to place the blame.
Dave
Save your BBS! Join INTBBS_WK now! 
--- timEd 1.10
---------------