TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: fidonews
to: MARK LEWIS
from: WILFRED VAN VELZEN
date: 2015-05-19 22:39:00
subject: Re: Fully connected to th

Hi,

On 2015-05-19 14:29:41, mark lewis wrote to Ward Dossche:
  about: "Fully connected to the FW":

 ml> 292/854 123/500 : fails
 ml> 292/854 280/464 249/303 261/38 140/1 123/500: works
 ml> 292/854 280/464 203/0 320/119 261/38 123/500: works
 ml> 292/854 280/464 227/51 120/544 140/1 123/500: works
 ml> 292/854 280/464 227/51 120/544 140/1 261/38 123/500: works

I notice a couple of things about this table:

If Ward and Ross indeed have a direct connection for this area, than messages
that leave Wards system to all his links for the area should have a SEEN-BY for
Ross's system: 123/500. So unless SEEN-BY's are stripped somewhere (not me) in
above path's, 140/1 and 261/38 shouldn't send it on to 123/500. I know Kris
227/51 had a misconfiguration untill 3 days ago, and was stripping SEEN-BY's.
But that doesn't explain the other paths, nor if these path's are from a later
date?

Do you have a msgid and date for messages with above paths? Than I can
investigate received and sent .pkt files in my backups.

Further if these path's are for a single message, why wasn't it dumped as dupe
the 2nd and 3th time it arrived at 140/1 and 261/3 ?

Bye, Wilfred.


--- FMail-W32-1.69.6.108-B20150519
* Origin: Native IPv6 connectable node (2:280/464)

SOURCE: echomail via QWK@docsplace.org

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.