| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: DOS Doors |
Hey Alan! Jun 24 14:35 06, Alan Ianson wrote to Maurice Kinal: AI> OS/2 is/was a good platform for running a BBS. From what I saw from a user's perspective running a linux terminal I'd have to agree with the above ... unfortunetly. One of these days that is going to have to change though. AI> There were/are a lot AI> of AI> native OS/2 BBS software & apps. Maximus comes to mind. I still think that whole ideology doesn't require porting to Linux in order to just get menuing and the such working. As far as squish, jam, whatever, I think all those should be left to the OS/2 guys to worry about. Too much DOS-think for Linux. AI> One summer we took off for 15 days AI> and AI> when we got back I turned on the monitor and there was BinkleyTerm AI> transfering mail as always. DOS wouldn't do that, well it might but AI> not likely. DOS wasn't that bad as long as one steered clear of MS software. However due to bios restrictions and the lack of multi-anything in DOS it never could seriously compete. It could be fun though and I can understand why embedded developers seem to prefer that methodology even though it is totally boring and uncreative. AI> A lot of OS/2 BBSs are still up and running. So far I prefer them from a user's perspective. AI> DOS doors run without AI> much AI> trouble so maybe that is why. Actually that isn't true. They've been known to crash a BBS even though the machine itself (OS/2) is still running just fine. That would make it difficult for a sysop to catch unless they try to login to their own BBS from a remote and see it firsthand. AI> I'm going to put some effort into making that happen in a linux way. Amen. Worry about the terminal, menuing and the such first. The rest can wait. AI> I AI> think that will take a long time to accomplish but I'll give it a AI> shot. I think it is easier then you think it is. Try a special account on your lan from a linux terminal and take it from there. You shouldn't even require ansi although it wouldn't hurt to have just in case you expect any DOS users. As for OS/2 users I think they are now using ncurses so there shouldn't be a problem with their terminals, except maybe xterm. As far as I am aware even an xterm is now working much better these days for this sort of thing. AI> Yep, there are times I'd like to stick around with Win or OS/2 but I AI> think in the long run that would bite my ass harder than getting with AI> the times. If you say so. From what I've seen lately they are all porting from unixie source so we're way ahead of the game. AI> Onward and upwards! Agreed. Life is good, Maurice --- Msged/LNX 6.2.0* Origin: The Pointy Stick Society XVIII - Don't know what I want (1:140/13.1) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 140/13 1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.