| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: DOS Doors |
Hey Alan! Jun 24 13:40 06, Alan Ianson wrote to Maurice Kinal: AI> Yep, it looks to me like it is. There are a few packages that need AI> more AI> work but the ones that I need are all there. I built my own started from my p3 smp guy. Still a few kinks to work out but I managed to get a half decent kernel built for x86_64 with 32-bit compatibility. The biggest hurdle was some of the 32-bit apps that rely on shorts being 16-bit. syslinux (isolinux) was the BIGGEST bugger. I think it is okay now. MK>> DOS apps for some strange reason. I've never understood why that is. AI> OS/2 is DOS app friendly, I used it myself for years. Why? I haven't seen anything in DOS worth slavaging let alone running on a nonDOS system. AI> far as I can see, anyway). Actually, I see quite a few gcc compilers AI> and GNU stuff travelling the OS/2 file echoes. It's an add on to OS/2 AI> though, *nix stuff is just that way.. :) Since IBM sold it out it has primarily been gcc ports of the unixie stuff. I see little there that isn't a port. From what I see I am guessing Linux is vastly superior seeing it has a HUGE headstart. Life is good, Maurice --- Msged/LNX 6.2.0* Origin: The Pointy Stick Society XVIII - Don't know what I want (1:140/13.1) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 140/13 1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.