Re: Synchronet
  By: Sean Dennis to Greg Goodwin on Sat Mar 17 2007 11:03 am

 > As for Synchronet, I prefer seperation of my BBS components...meaning if the
 > BBS goes down, the mail will still run.  My BBS is actually a seperate syste
 > from my mail system, so there's a little safety there.  Again, I prefer OS/2


yeah, but that's a moot point, because you arent forced to run anything that 
you dont want to run.

i used mdaemon as a mailserver, i use apache as my 
webserver, and filezilla as my ftp server.

that way, i am able to pick what i consider the best of the best.

 > that Synchronet is a little much for a BBS software, but like I said, to eac
 > their own.

see my comment above. also, regarding synchronet as a telnet capable bbs 
software, it's definetly one of the best avaliable.

 > Although that full screen editor isn't something I particularly
enjoy. 

well, i dont know what you mean by full screen editor, there is an internal 
editor, but all of us use what we want.

i prever quikedit, other people use 
fedit or whatever they please.

it's great to be able to use your own editor,
people can even make their own personal editor with .js.

 > Of course, Rob haunts this echo and a few others, so he pops up now and agai
 > too.

yeah, rob is active on dovenet fidonet and the yahoo group. i dont know how 
he does it.

--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32