Re: Hi
  By: Sean Dennis to Jason Hud on Sun Jan 14 2007 05:07 pm

 >  JH> well, elebbs is being worked on, and a few others i wouldnt care to
 >  JH> use.

 > EleBBS is?  Where?  I haven't heard of it.  It's still got more bugs in it t
 > my old house... 

yeah, they're working on it. i dont know much about the specifics, but scott 
little and other programers are working on it.

'zomorf' for instance is a sysop who loves elebbs and, i feel, gives it 
direction.

 >  JH> is renegade being developed? i guess that's a matter of opinion.

 > It's improving, so I'd guess yes, it is being developed.

yeah okay! improving! heehe

 >  JH> other guy's coding on it. i have a team, that's the ticket!] is the
 >  JH> way to go.

 > I don't think that's what's happening.  T.J. has done more in a year's time
 > than most of the other RG "developers" did in a ten year period.

well, that's what's happening. tj is not a programmer. he and chris went 
around begging for coding from experienced programmers. that hasnt changed.

now, i would say the y2k fix is the most important renegade development.
if chris hoppman, tj, and whoever else have done more than other 'developers' 
that's really not saying much.  sadly, if the source had got out sooner, 
maybe renegade wouldnt be the bastard child that it is today.

but, perhaps lang had some reason for giving it to a person like spence. 
perhaps he felt that arrivan's own arrogance would keep the source from 
getting out.

hell, we dont even know for sure that lang didnt want the source out.

maybe he gave it to spence so he could put it to death and the people that 
loved renegade could blame someone else. 

--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32