From: Gene McAloon 

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:01:33 -0400, "Mark"  wrote:

>If the desired result of their protests came to pass, then tyranny would
>have prevailed. Ergo, they were in favor of tyranny, how hard is that to
>digest?

Whose tyranny, Saddam's or the US's? We replaced Saddam's tyranny with our
own. It is obvious from what has been happening in Iraq that the Iraqis
preferred tyranny by one of their own to tyranny imposed by Americans.

It was against imposing our own form of tyranny on the Iraqis that they marched.
Looking at the mess Iraq has become and is likely to remain for the
foreseeable future, the marchers were right.

Of course, going to war against Iraq was not supposed to be about removing
a dictator, but about that dictator being a threat to the US with his WMD. 
Utter bullshit, of course.  When the public finally woke up to that fact,
then the spin began that we were rescuing Iraqis from tyranny. What
bullshit that is too.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5