> TR>problem with Rod's Supra modem. It seems 
> TR>his Supra now has problems with USR V34+ modems.  
> TR>Funny that.  Maybe it's just not a very good 
> TR>implementation of V32bis.  

> They are completely different faults, and the first 
> one was seen on Maestro and other Rockwell-based modems, 
> so it's a bit rich to complain about the Supra modem in 
> particular for being stuffed re V32bis.  BFN.  Paul.  

TR> You think? When the Netcomm using the identical Rockwell chipset as, for 
TR> example, the Maestro did not exhibit the "problem". The
difference was, of 
TR> course, in the firmware used by Netcomm. So, yes, I'd say the Supra's a bit 
TR> on the iffy side of the fence twice now.  

Supra, Boca, Maestro, ie anyone using the *complete* Rockwell
solution, then is "on the iffy side of the fence".  Personally
I think it was far more likely to be the Spirit's fault on that
one.  And if you call the Supra "iffy", then you must also call
the Maestro, Boca, etc "iffy" as well, I didn't notice you making 
that statement.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---