>    Hi Jack,
 >
 > On that fateful 20.02.98   Jack Sargeant  took up
 > his automatic rifle and snarled about "What are skeptics?":
 > JS> > So doubting and questioning is the method of a skeptic, but not
 > JS> > manic disagreeing.
 > JS>
 > JS> > So this is what I think to be a skeptic. Can we agree on that?
 > JS>
 > JS>Sure, and the reason Galileo was harangued by the Church was because
 > JS>they were died-in-the-wool, head-in-the-sand skeptics, pure and simple.
 > JS>You may not like it that they too are included in the group, but
 > JS>nevertheless, they are!
 > Again, that is not what I take for skepticism.
Be as skeptical as you want to. ...Just don't be so at the expense
of others. That is to say, be skeptical in a non-aggressive way.
There will be no "monsters of the id" in UFO.
js
--- FMail 1.22
---------------