| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Article: Rethinking G |
On Sat, 22 May 2004 22:44:34 +0000 (UTC), Robert Karl Stonjek wrote: > Rethinking Genetic Determinism > With only 30,000 genes, what is it that makes humans human? > By Paul H. Silverman > > For more than 50 years scientists have operated under a set of seemingly > incontrovertible assumptions about genes, gene expression, and the > consequences thereof. Their mantra: One gene yields one protein; genes > beget messenger RNA, which in turn begets protein; and most critically, > the gene is deterministic in gene expression and can therefore predict > disease propensities. This is total nonsense. I've been teaching about genes that don't make mRNA or proteins for 25 years and I learned about them long before that. > Yet during the last five years, data have revealed inadequacies in this > theory. Unsettling results from the Human Genome Project (HGP) in > particular have thrown the deficiencies into sharp relief. Some genes > encode more than one protein; others don't encode proteins at all. I've also been teaching students about genes that encode more than one protein for 25 years. > These findings help refine evolutionary theory by explaining an explosion > of diversity from relatively little starting material. Really? > We therefore need to rethink our long-held beliefs: A reevaluation of > the genetic determinism doctrine, coupled with a new systems biology > mentality, could help consolidate and clarify genome-scale data, enabling > us finally to reap the rewards of the genome sequencing projects. This soounds a lot like new-age doublespeak. Who is this guy? > UNEXPECTED RESULTS In the mid- and late 1980s, our testimony before the > congressional committees controlling HGP purse strings relied upon our > old assumptions.1 In describing the genome's potential medical value, > we elevated the status of the gene in human development and by extension, > human health. At the same time, the deterministic nature of the gene > entered the social consciousness with talk of "designer" babies and DNA > police that could detect future criminals. Whatever ... > Armed with DNA determinism, scientific entrepreneurs convinced venture > capitalists and the lay public to invest in multi-billion-dollar > enterprises whose aim was to identify the anticipated 100,000-plus genes > in the human genome, patent the nucleotide sequences, and then lease or > sell that information to pharmaceutical companies for use in drug > discovery. Most experts thought there would be fewer than 50,000 genes. They turned out to be right. > Prominent among these were two Rockville, Md.-based companies, Celera, > under the leadership of J. Craig Venter, and Human Genome Sciences, led > by William Haseltine. > > But when the first draft of the human genome sequence was published in the > spring of 2001, the unexpectedly low gene count (less than 30,000) elicited > a hasty reevaluation of this business model. On a genetic level, humans, > it seems, are not all that different from flies and worms. No experts were surprised at this result. > Or maybe they are, if we can assume that genes are not strictly > deterministic. As Venter et al. reported in their genome manuscript: "A > single gene may give rise to multiple transcripts, and thus multiple > distinct proteins with multiple functions by means of alternative splicing > and alternative transcription initiation and termination sites."2 > > The industry shakeup was predictable. Celera, Human Genome Sciences, and > most of the other genomic sequencing firms refocused their business plans > and downsized. Venter resigned as president of Celera, and Haseltine has > indicated his intention to do the same. I think Venter and Haseltine were probably kidnapped by aliens or maybe they've been murdered by the Masons. It's certain that there has to be some kind of world-wide conspiracy in order to explain all these strange happenings. > Read the rest at The Scientist > http://www.the-scientist.com/yr2004/may/research3_040524.html The Scientist is not a credible magazine. Larry Moran --- þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com --- * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 5/23/04 5:16:43 PM* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.