From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">


>> Last time I checked you posited no proof that the Russians have done
>> anything at all so given the complete lack of any evidence, what need
>> have they to claim anything?
>
> Who else is being mentioned as having conducted this murder?

Blimey, that sounds exactly like a "self proclaimed theory being
validated by your own opinion".



> I would
> think you would be more concerned about a British cit being killed in
> Britain for speaking out. Guess not.

I am concerned. Many are. Many were concerned about British Citizens being
kidnapped & held in a gulag in Cuba w/o charge or trial too.

Anti-terrorism is a rough game it appears.

> I am seeing many people pointing to
> the Russians in this.

Polonium ain't the easiest thing to get hold of esp not in exact
quantities. However that does not change the fact that it's a self
proclaimed theory seeking validation.

> Although I see none backing your theory that it was
> done under anti-terrorism laws.
>

If their position is that they ain't done it then why would a non-existent
act come under such laws. Were positive evidence to surface then so would
the laws.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5