From: George Sherwood 

On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:24:37 +0000, Adam wrote:

> George Sherwood wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:34:04 +0000, Adam wrote:
>>
>>>>> Those killing in Chechnya were condemned as were those
doing the same
>>>>> job in the Yugoslav/serbian intel orgs etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now however there's not a lot you can really say to a
country which
>>>>> sends out it's killers & kidnappers so long as
they can turn round to
>>>>> you & use the "national
security/terrorism" card where the state gets to
>>>>> define both.
>>>> Have you seen Russia claim this?  Show me the type of
killings that I am
>>>> calling murders here that are being claimed as legit under
what you call
>>>> the "new rules".  It is a theory in your mind. 
You are the one claiming
>>>> Russia is using the "WoT" against people like
this.  Not Russia or any
>>>> other country.
>>>>
>>>> George
>>> It's now the Russian Law & has been since July.
>>>
>>> http://www.mosnews.com/news/2006/07/07/fedcouncilterror.shtml
>>>
>>> "Russiaƒ ™s upper house of parliament ƒ ” the Federation
Council ƒ ”
approved
>>> an act investing the president with wider power in hunting and
>>> eliminating terror suspects across the globe, the RIA-Novosti news
>>> agency reports.
>>>
>>> The resolution gives the countryƒ ™s president the right to
use the armed
>>> forces and secret services abroad to fight international terrorism. In
>>> line with the document, the armed forces and secret services can act
>>> abroad to stop terrorist activity in order to protect citizensƒ ™ rights
>>> and freedoms, Russiaƒ ™s sovereignty, independence and territorial
integrity.
>>> "
>>>
>>> Do try & keep up dear boy.
>>>
>>> Take the above & realise that it's up to the Russian gov
to define what
>>> constitutes a threat etc.
>>
>> Asking you to keep up.  Back to the same old story. Again, just because you
>> claim it, it doesn't make it so.
>
> ROFLMAO This from the man who posted a post entitled "Shoot them in
> Moscow, Poison in London"
>
> & where you stated "Looks like Putin is starting to work early to
> consolidate power before the 2008 elections.  Make sure who ever he
> anoints will be elected president."
>
> ROFLMAO. No proof whatsoever but then you ask for it from others. Ah
> dear me.
>
>> So me where Russia has claimed any of
>> these killings fall under their fight against international terrorism
>> laws. Last time I checked, you don't speak for them.
>>
> Last time I checked you posited no proof that the Russians have done
> anything at all so given the complete lack of any evidence, what need
> have they to claim anything?

Who else is being mentioned as having conducted this murder?  I would think
you would be more concerned about a British cit being killed in Britain for
speaking out. Guess not.  I am seeing many people pointing to the Russians
in this. Although I see none backing your theory that it was done under
anti-terrorism laws.

George

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5