From: "Mark" 

You read more than was there or applied what was there incorrectly.

"Gene McAloon"  wrote in message
news:bo9gf055sse1k99gvc6o8bdh42a5lu6s4o{at}4ax.com...
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:04:10 -0400, "Mark"
 wrote:
>
> >What part of this is so hard to understand?
>
> What is so hard to understand is why you made the false statement you did.
You
> said the company is not required to give her a venue for her remarks and
pay her
> too. Well, of course the company didn't do either of those things. So,
what was
> your point? You did not have one.
>
> What is so hard about that to understand?
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5