From: Gene McAloon 

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:08:58 +0200, Phil Payne
 wrote:

>Mark wrote:
>>
>> "Gary Wiltshire"  wrote: BLIX
rejected Saddam's
>> "documentation."
>>
>> Shh, that doesn't fit the model.
>
>http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,902906,00.html
>
>"Asked if there was any indication by the Iraqis of
"substantive progress
>or proactive cooperation", Mr Blix replied, "Yes.""

Which explains in no small part why Bush had to rush to war with or without
UN approval. If Blix had been allowed to complete his inspections, he would
have made hash of Bush's claims.

Chirac wasn't half the threat to Bush's agenda that Blix was.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5