Hi KEN,
    
On that fateful 18.02.98   KEN KUBOS  took up
his automatic rifle and snarled:  "ET's would visit us...":
KK>I can think of  5 reasons ET's would visit us:
KK>
KK>1)  We have Nuclear Energy.
KK>
KK>2)  We are doing HGP Human Genome Project. We are beginning to know our
KK>    own DNA and we're now Cloning.
KK>
KK>3)  We are beginning to use Internet, which breaks down our countries
KK>    ties to us. We are beginning to break down the Tribal Warfare which
KK>    our counties have relied on for so long.
KK>
KK>4)  We are beginning to use Nanotechnology. We have yet to produce an
KK>    assembler but we're trying.
KK>
KK>5)  We're using Neural Networks to solve some our problems, but it's
KK>    only resident in a few of our computers.  We have to change our
KK>    computers, per se, to reflect Neural Network philosophies. Enter
KK>    American Computer Corp.
And why should this be interesting for ETīs? I see no connection 
there.
Certainly this is nothing that ETīs would want to learn from us, 
because this would be old technlolgy for them. Or do you want to say 
that the earth is a gigantic technical museum for them?
Till then,
Heiko
--- CrossPoint v3.11 R
---------------
** A related thread FOLLOWS this message.

FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 221 UFO           Ref: F2TE2026 Date: 02/24/98
From: KEN KUBOS                                             Time: 10:33am
\/To: HEIKO DIEKMANN                                      (Read 2 times)
Subj: R: Re: ET's would visit us..

 -=> Quoting Heiko Diekmann to Ken Kubos <=-

 KK>5)  We're using Neural Networks to solve some our problems, but it's
 KK>    only resident in a few of our computers.  We have to change our
 KK>    computers, per se, to reflect Neural Network philosophies. Enter
 KK>    American Computer Corp.
 HD> And why should this be interesting for ETīs? I see no connection 
 HD> there.
 HD> Certainly this is nothing that ETīs would want to learn from us, 
 HD> because this would be old technlolgy for them. Or do you want to say 
 HD> that the earth is a gigantic technical museum for them?
 HD> Till then,
 HD> Heiko

You out to check it out on ACC:  It's Web Site is below.

From ACC:

"Whoever engineered it, may have had even denser, faster forms of memory
they used as "Storage"-like hard drives, perhaps operating in the
hundreds of Exabytes (10 to the 18th) worth of memory, but due to the
lack of sufficient understanding by Human researchers in 1947, such
devices remain (perhaps hidden in archives) undocumented, and the
Transcapacitor, instead of just being used as "storage" and despite its
unbelievable speed, MAY ACTUALLY HAVE BEEN PART OF A COMPUTATIONAL
DEVICE, A LOGIC PROCESSING UNIT , a CPU (rather than a "solid state disk
drive") and considered insufficient as a storage device by its original
designers, as previously thought, despite the fact that it is hundreds
of times more dense and thousands of times faster than Human Storage
Devices."

It's the Q-chip which is Jack Sarfatti's (Stardrive's Web Site)
contruction.

You can check into the following URL sites:

Stardrive: http://www.stardrive.org/title.html

C-Ship: http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/cship.html

Antigravity: http://www.math.iupui.edu/marc/antigravity.html
             http://cspar.uah.edu/www/research/gravity.htmlx

American Computer: http://www.american-computer.com/roswell.htm


... Cheerios are the seeds of the donut tree.  - Homer Simpson    
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12

---------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LAST Message In Thread <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

FIDO MESSAGE AREA==> TOPIC: 221 UFO           Ref: F2T00023 Date: 02/19/98
From: HEIKO DIEKMANN                                        Time: 11:17pm
\/To: FRED AUSTIN                                         (Read 2 times)
Subj: Re: Skeptics are sometimes wrong

   Hi Fred,
    
On that fateful 18.02.98   Fred Austin  took up
his automatic rifle and snarled: "Skeptics are sometimes wrong":
HD>> They ignored the evidence, and didnot test it. Thatos no skepticism
HD>> but exactly the opposite.
FA>    Heiko,
FA>
FA>         Have you ever heard of the expression "Ignore it and maybe it
FA>will  go  away".  The  skeptical churches  did not  test out  theories
FA>because of the chance the man would be correct and it would  upset the
FA>status quo, and make them all look like idiots.......
Yes indeed, but that is not skepticism but belief. Skepticism is something 
different. Just read what i wrote to Jack. 
Till then,
Heiko
--- CrossPoint v3.11 R
---------------