BG> Given that they've been doing it that way for at least 9
BG> years, I'd tend to agree. However, I also agree that the
BG> necessity of writing the baud rate to NVRAM with &W after a
BG> change of port speed in the term should be far better
BG> documented than it is right now.
DD> I believe that USR have some notion that users of their modems will be
DD> capable of simple logical deduction.
And we've seen what happens with your logical deductions, so that's
yet another design fault of the USR. BFN. Paul.
@EOT:
---
* Origin: X (3:711/934.9)
|