| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM Mirror grinder-MOT or TOT |
From: James P Crombie To: John Murray Cc: Atm List Reply-To: James P Crombie John I am not getting a lot of variation in the readings, maybe .0002", with most of that being at the very edge where it is the roughest. I will try switching around to TOT for a couple of sessions. I am currently using about a 25% overhang ( 2" on an 8" mirror) , does this sound about right for flattening it out a bit or should I increase it to a 1/3 stroke. John Murray wrote: >G'day Again, > One thing I found with my hogging through to fine grinding was thatit was >difficult to hit the f# right on the money. I was originally aiming for f6 >but ended up at f5.1. With the #80 grit, I had a shallow centre with >progressively steeper curve as I went to the edge. That is, there was a fair >amount of variation in the spherometer readings. This I attributed to sludge >pooling under the centre of the blank (My setup was TOT, MOB) As I moved up >through the grits though, this difference slowly disappeared. Obviously the >allowable error range is greater the coarser the grit. As a result my >spherometer readings slowly standardised until I was at 1000 grit with no >measurable difference using my depth gauge. > As I went through the grit sizes, I too noticed that the pits on the >outside took longer to disappear. I moved my overarm out slightly to stop >deepening the overall sphere and also to get the edge working a bit more. As >you know, this is my first mirror. It worked for me but I'm not saying it's >correct...... > >Cheers > >John Murray >Whyalla >South Australia >Check our web page at http://astronomy.sa86net.com ATM and M-O-M stuff. > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-atm{at}shore.net [mailto:owner-atm{at}shore.net]On Behalf Of James >>P Crombie >>Sent: Saturday, 26 July 2003 2:54 PM >>To: Atm List >>Subject: ATM Mirror grinder-MOT or TOT >> >> >> >>I have progressed to 120 grit and have most of the pits from the >>60grit. But the Sagitta is slowly getting deeper. If I switch to TOT >>will this flatten the sagitta out a bit? I am aiming for .012(on the >>spherometer) and I am currently at .0132". This will give me a ROC of >>116" instead of the 128" I am looking for. >> >>Some new pictures up on the mirror grinder page below >> >>-- >>-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>James P Crombie >> >>Summerside Machinist >>Prince Edward Island Amateur Astronomer >>Canada 3D Designer >> >>E-mail jpcrombie{at}pei.eastlink.ca >>Astronomy webpage http://www.jamescrombie.com >>Rhinoceros 3D webpage http://www.jamescrombie.com/rhino/ >>Mirror Grinder page http://www.jamescrombie.com/pics/ >>------------------------------------------------------------------ >>-------- >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- James P Crombie Summerside Machinist Prince Edward Island Amateur Astronomer Canada 3D Designer E-mail jpcrombie{at}pei.eastlink.ca Astronomy webpage http://www.jamescrombie.com Rhinoceros 3D webpage http://www.jamescrombie.com/rhino/ Mirror Grinder page http://www.jamescrombie.com/pics/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/100 1 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.