BG>> Given that they've been doing it that way for at least 9 
BG>> years, I'd tend to agree.  However, I also agree that the 
BG>> necessity of writing the baud rate to NVRAM with &W after a 
BG>> change of port speed in the term should be far better 
BG>> documented than it is right now.

DD>> I believe that USR have some notion that users of their 
DD>> modems will be capable of simple logical deduction.

PE> And we've seen what happens with your logical deductions, so 
PE> that's yet another design fault of the USR.  BFN.  Paul.

DD> The ring messages produced by my modem are recognised by my software. What 
DD> more could I ask for?

Proper autobauding.  More strictly speaking, that is what *I*
could ask for.  I have no idea what goes through a zealot's
mind (actually I do, but not with modems).  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---