RB> USR can hardly be blamed then, if they did not match Rockwells
RB> interpretation of the Turbo code.
PE> The complaint is not about V32terbo, but of V32terbo interfering
PE> with V32bis operation. The Supra doesn't support V32bis, so there
BG> ^^^^^^ V.32terbo
BG> Was your remaining brain cell out of sync again, Paul ? :)
Yeah, that was a typo.
PE> is no reason for it to be penalised for any problems that may or
PE> may not exist in different interpretations of V32terbo.
BG> Of course, one could rather unkindly suggest that as Supra have never made
BG> an Austel approved modem, the "problem" is moot...
That's exactly what Mike Boorne told me when I reported the
double-sending problem. Oh, didn't I mention the Supra caller
I am talking about is calling from USA? BFN. Paul.
@EOT:
---
* Origin: X (3:711/934.9)
|