| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Origin of DNA |
r norman wrote in
news:c8jevn$1666$1{at}darwin.ediacara.org:
> On Thu, 20 May 2004 15:30:07 +0000 (UTC), Tim Tyler
> wrote:
>>However, the revolution will come. In the future many organisms will
>>have their heritable information stored not in DNA - but in databases
>>in the factories that produced them.
>>DNA will change roles from storer of heritable information to
>>messenger between the database and the phenotype. The resulting mDNA
>>will thus follow RNA's route out of the mainstream of biology - and
>>into the periphery.
> Biological information storage and copying using DNA (or RNA) has been
> around for billions of years. Human information storage using "hard
> copy" writing on tablets, papyri, manuscripts, and books has been
> around for thousands of years. There is no form of digital information
> storage that has lasted more than several decades. One of the classic
> problems facing librarians and other professionals in the information
> storage and retrieval business is to find a method of information
> storage that is likely to still be available 50 or 100 or 500 years
> from now! I have "archival quality" mylar punched
"paper" tape that
> is likely to last in perfect physical condition for millennia.
> Unfortunately, the tape is worthless because there are no punched
> paper tape readers available any more. Similarly, my stacks of IBM
> cards, although made of heavy-duty paper and therefore are perishable,
> are still in excellent shape but are just as unusable as my 8-inch
> floppies. Even the recent 5-1/4" floppies are almost impossible to
> read and the 3-1/2" floppies are quickly becoming obsolete. How long
> do you think CD's or DVD's will last? As long as 8-track tape?
> "Modern" methods may be more "effective" or more
"efficient" or
> "better". But they certainly do have their drawbacks. Maybe biology
> was extremely clever to stay with a system that works for such a long
> time! Why do you think it would be "beneficial" to change, now?
The people at the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration,
based on an article I read several years ago, tend to prefer stone
tablets as the most viable long term storage medium among the various
technologies used by humans to store information :-)
Yours,
Bill Morse
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com
---
* RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
* RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 5/21/04 10:41:23 PM
* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.