Gary Gilmore wrote in a message to Chris Holten:
GG> Now, if all my BBS did was textfiles, I might say "Yes, 57600
GG> is worth it", but since most of BBSing is downloading and
GG> reading messages (and most of that is users download mail
GG> packets), I still say that a port speed of 115200 isn't
GG> necessaary. Besides, many doors can't handle speeds higher
GG> than 57600, so there's a problem for those that offer doors to
GG> the user.
One of the things that I was thinking you'd get from locking higher would be
a difference in the amount of time that the system would spend dealing with
things happening on that port. This may be true or not, I can't say one way
or the other. Or it may be of importance only to those who are running
multitaskers like the DV I run here.
I changed my setup a while back from 38400 to 57600 and couldn't really tell
any difference one way or the other...
email: roy.j.tellason%tanstaaf@frackit.com
---
---------------
* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-432-0764 (1:270/615)
|