TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: maximus
to: GARY GILMORE
from: ROY J. TELLASON
date: 1997-06-13 11:15:00
subject: Bogus Baud rates!!!

Gary Gilmore wrote in a message to Chris Holten:
 GG> Now, if all my BBS did was textfiles, I might say "Yes, 57600 
 GG> is worth it", but since most of BBSing is downloading and 
 GG> reading messages (and most of that is users download mail 
 GG> packets), I still say that a port speed of 115200 isn't 
 GG> necessaary.  Besides, many doors can't handle speeds higher 
 GG> than 57600, so there's a problem for those that offer doors to 
 GG> the user. 
One of the things that I was thinking you'd get from locking higher would be 
a difference in the amount of time that the system would spend dealing with 
things happening on that port.  This may be true or not,  I can't say one way 
or the other.  Or it may be of importance only to those who are running 
multitaskers like the DV I run here.
I changed my setup a while back from 38400 to 57600 and couldn't really tell 
any difference one way or the other...
email: roy.j.tellason%tanstaaf@frackit.com 
--- 
---------------
* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-432-0764 (1:270/615)

SOURCE: echomail via exec-pc

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.