Re: SBBS/W32 Kermit SABOTAGE
  By: MICHEL SAMSON to STEPHEN HURD on Fri Nov 05 2004 08:06:00

 >      I have ignored Rob Swindell's `Kermit' SABOTAGE for over a year, in
 > hope the situation would improve somehow.  I couldn't avoid the need for
 > an UpDate since at least two SysOps complained about Rob's setup lately,
 > not to mention the BBSers who are completely mystified by this SABOTAGE.

I still fail to see how including a setup that happens to do the job (ie:
transfer files) using Kermit is a form of sabotage.  It's been tested with
Kermit95, C-Kermit and G-Kermit.  I'm fairly certain that even you have managed
to transfer files using that setup and MS-Kermit (note: This is based on
memory, not fact of any sort)  I'm *positive* that winston Smith... another
MS0Kermit user has manager to transfer files using the Kermit protocol as
included with Synchronet.

I'm still waiting to hear exactly what "$hareWare" Rob is
"forcing" sysops to
use.
--- SBBSecho 2.10-FreeBSD