| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM Astroscan Houghton |
From: John Swenson To: atm list Reply-To: John Swenson Gary, Bob et al, on MY astroscan when star testing I get severe spherical aberation and a Ronchi test (scope still in tact, ie going through the front "window") shows almost straight lines, they are slightly bent near the edges. This is NOT an 1/8 wave parabolic or a properly done schmidt newt. Testing the refelctions off the front glass it looks like a pretty flat piece of glass. As far as I can tell this is a pretty good f 4.2 spherical mirror with a window in front, which to me sounds like a prime candidate for converting to a Houghton. Which was the question in the first place :) I've already done parabolic mirrors, I wanted to try a Houghton and this sounds like it might be an appropriate starting point. So the prime question is, how thin can I make the lenses and what grinding and polishing problems will I have if I make them thin? I'm planning on building a small machine to do these (I'm working on a full size M-O-M now, but I think I'll try a quick and dirty small machine to try making these lenses). How much difference is working with BK7 as opposed to plate glass? I can get some plate glass blanks to practice on very cheaply and work out the techniques but will that apply to BK7? Thanks for any input on this, John S. --- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.