jimmcginn{at}yahoo.com (Jim McGinn) wrote in message
news:...
> jimmcginn{at}yahoo.com (Jim McGinn) wrote 
> 
> > [moderator's note: I'd caution Brian and everyone else that
> > discussion in s.b.e. is hardly authoritative. While we have
> > our share of sober-minded evolution professionals, we also have
> > our share of eager tyros, and perhaps more than our share of
> > just plain contrariness. It may be a useful source of references
> > in the professional literature, however, and in many cases, the
> > talk.origins FAQ documents are also useful, at www.talkorigins.org.
> > Good luck. - JAH]
> 
> As I explain previously, the logic of Hamilton's kin selection 
> pivots off of nothing but an erroneous application of english 
> (specifically it involves misusage of the word share which 
> involves two different meanings of the word being used 
> interchangeably).  When this misusage is corrected Hamilton's 
> kin selection falls like a house of cards.  This is true 
> regardless of whether the person investigating it is or is not 
> a "sober-minded evolution professional."
> 
> [moderator's note: I agree that one should examine Jim's previous
> claims on this matter. - JAH]

Yes, Josh.  Why don't you take the challenge that I offered to Guy
back when, you know where I asked him to choose one of the two
definitions of share and see if he could use it throughout the
argument.  You won't do this though.  You'll do just as Guy did and
simply refuse to answer the question.

It's really funny the degree that you professional pretenders rely on
the fact that few people actually think any of this through.

Jim
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 6/7/04 10:22:46 PM