From: "Mark" 


"Monte Davis"  wrote in message
news:c7kcn21d196cd80vdj8dftqeu4rejh4ee7{at}4ax.com...
> John Cuccia  wrote:
>
>>One of the options now being considered in Washington is to pick a
>>winning side in Iraq and support it.
>
> Yeah, I've heard and read that half a dozen times in the last week.
>
> Hey, Busheviks: When you went into a country where 20% of the
> population had had its foot on the neck of 80% of the population for
> generations, and said "Hey presto -- you're a democracy!"... you
> *already* chose sides for all intents and purposes.

And those intents and purposes were righteous, weren't they? Or are you
okay with a dictator coating the minority with sugar to maintain his foot
on the neck of the majority? 

> Did you really
> think the Sunni would say "aw heck, we lose our privileged status, but
> we're free from Ba'ath dictatorship [which had been intimately
> intertwined with the privileged status] so it's a net plus, thanks
> Dubya"....?

No, not a fucking soul thought they'd roll over, but I think most thought
they'd be rolled over, incorrectly as it turns out 

> That the war hawks were too fucking stupid to realize it then, and are
> now fondling the notion as a shiny new "option," is sadly revealing.

That the Casper Milquetoast brigade you represent is still so clueless is
despicably sad and that you and your supported ilk, fucking won the last
election and are still fucking clueless and continuing to do your
"Bush Lied" bullshit routine, is worrisome for the future of our
republic 

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5