| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | RE: Non-uniform illumination (was: Re: ATM Foucault testing an hyperbol |
From: "Tom Krajci" To: Reply-To: "Tom Krajci" From: "James W. Burrows" >In good ol' shadow-matching Foucault, non-uniform illumination would >certainly introduce errors - the difference in illumination would result in >a longitudinal reading shift to balance the zone brightnesses.... This is one reason I favor the wire test...it does not suffer as much from non-even illumination...which is more and more difficult to achieve when testing faster optics. The wire test uses position of shadows, not comparison/matching of brightness of separated shadows. As your optics get faster, the wire test has more strong points in its favor. Also, compared to the Gavoila/caustic test...the wire test only needs to measure longitudinal motion...so you can use the same traveling stage as you do for the Foucalt test, instead of making a more complex two-axis stage for caustic testing. Tom Krajci Tashkent, Uzbekistan -+- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 --- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.