Maurice,
 
> All things considered, there was more evidence to support an attack on
> Saudi Arabia then Iraq.
 
I agree on that but it is very unlikely.
 
The Saudi's (probably one of the most corrupt, nepotist, undemocratic [and
much more negative] regimes) are the protectors of the holiest of holy
shrines of Islam.
 
Attacking Saudi Arabia would be the beginning of an all out holy war.
 
The concept would be interesting though ... the west's oil-reserves would
be stressed so bad they probably would be unable to wage such a war and the
Arab's without oil-revenues would be unable to finance theirs.
 
 \%/{at}rd

--- DB 1.58/001877