From: "Gary Britt" 

Fake and/or trumped up stories run just before the special election in
California, which were uncorroborated, false, misleading, and not prepared
in conformance with even the LA Times' own previous limited standards of
verification and corroboration for political stories were clearly aimed at
trying to swing the election for Gray Davis.  This fact was recognized
nationally and should be easy for you to turn up, unless you are dedicated
to not seeing same.  The decline in the LA times readership is well
documented.  I've seen the links posted on Drudge many times.  They lost
many thousands of subscriptions for their transparent attempt at throwing
the special election to Gray Davis.  A trend that has been going on for
some time.

Look it up, I'm not wasting my time looking for info for a Canadian liberal
who isn't interested in changing his opinion about anything American.

Gary

"John Beamish"  wrote in
message news:410fb8f4$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Interesting assessment of the LA Times.  Could you point to me one (or
more)
> locations where each of those statements is made and supported?  (You
don't
> have to find one piece with all of them ... just one citation for each of
> them.)
>
> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> news:410fb659$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > That's Cook's opinion, for whatever its worth.  Not much.  BTW, the LA
> Times
> > is recognized as one of the most liberal left wing actively partisan,
> shade
> > the truth, tell outright lies, run fake stories to try and manipulate
> > elections, etc. newspapers in the United States.  They don't carry much
> > weight at all, except with the hate America first crowd that is already
on
> > their side.  They have been losing readership steadily over the past
> couple
> > years as a result of their dedication to manipulation versus reporting.
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5