From: "Glenn Meadows" 

Isn't the fly in this ointment the cross states rights recognition law?  If
one state allows and honors a Marriage, then isn't it required that all the
other states have to accept and honor the original states laws?  It is a
sticky wicket along those lines.

--
Glenn M.


"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:410e940f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> That's not the law in almost any respect.  However, both Bush and I have
no
> problem at all with Domestic Partnership laws sometimes known as Civil
> Unions.  In general these laws recognize that contract between the two
> people without binding the federal government.  So gay couples can then be
> the next of kin at a hospital, inherit from, get divorced and take each
> others property just like married couples.
>
> Gary
>
>
> "Phil Payne"  wrote in message
> news:410E8964.90E8EB87{at}isham-research.com...
> > Gary Britt wrote:
> > >
> > > I prefer their current course where they are trying to make sure that
it
> > > remains a matter for state legislatures to decide and not federal
> judges.
> >
> > I think if two people shake hands on a deal it's a matter for them and
no
> > one else.
> >
> > --
> >   Phil Payne
> >   http://www.isham-research.com
> >   +44 7785 302 803
> >   +49 173 6242039
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5